Abstract

Positive urban agglomeration and its efficient management remain understudied in Russia. However, these processes require a system of strategic priorities to minimize threats, especially in the regions. This paper presents an OTSW analysis of regional agglomeration processes, highlighting their opportunities, threats, strengths, and weaknesses. The research covered the data on population density and real estate market in large agglomerations published by the Federal State Statistics Service and the Institute of Urban Economics in 2016–2023. Agglomerations give their residents more opportunities, i.e., career prospects, education, entertainment, etc. The combined potential of several settlements makes it possible to rationalize production factors while minimizing their logistics to a limited number of large centers. The threats to agglomeration processes include uncontrolled growth that leads to a multi-link territory, thus complicating agglomeration management. In addition, agglomerations attract highly qualified personnel, which contributes to the brain-drain process from small towns and municipal districts. Finally, agglomeration has a negative impact on the environment. Regional agglomerations need good transport infrastructure to connect the core and suburbs. Managing positive agglomeration effects and reducing negative consequences require joint efforts of the state, local authorities, and economic entities. The results can be used to develop new strategies for urban agglomerations and socio-economic regional programs.

Keywords

agglomeration process, region, city, strategic management, priority, opportunity, threat, OTSW analysis, migration growth

REFERENCES

1. Granberg AG. Strategiya territorialnogo sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii: ot idei k realizatsii [Strategy of territorial socio-economic development of Russia: from idea to implementation]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2001;9:9–15. (In Russ.)
2. Zhikharevich BS. Strategicheskoe planirovanie ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya: 35 let kanadskogo opyta [Strategic economic development planning: 35 Years of Canadian experience]. St. Petersburg: Leontʹevskiy tsentr; 2004. 288 p. (In Russ.)
3. Zhuravlev DM, Chaadaev VK. Strategic instruments for the growth of the industrial sector of the economy in the conditions of the sixth big Kondratiev cycle. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2023; 16(3):253–262. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-3-253-262
4. Kvint VL. The concept of strategizing. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: NWIM RANEPA; 2019. 132 p. (In Russ.)
5. Kvint VL, Seredyuk IV. Strategic assessment of the compliance of open diffuse agglomerations with global, national and regional trends (Kemerovo region – Kuzbass agglomerations case study). Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2025;18(1):7–23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2025-1-1435
6. Kolomak E. Uneven spatial development in Russia: explanations of new economic geography. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2013;(2):132–150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-2-132-150
7. Lavrikova YuG. Strategic priorities of spatial development of regions in network economy. Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2008;5:37–49. (In Russ.)
8. Lopatnikov LI. Ekonomiko-matematicheskiy slovar: slovar sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy nauki [Econo-mic and mathematical dictionary of modern economic science]. Moscow: Delo; 2003. 520 p. (In Russ.)
9. Novikova IV. Strategic leader in the digital economy: role, qualities and characteristics. Social and labor research. 2021;45(4):150–160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2021-45-4-150-160
10. Rastvortseva SN. Upravleniye razvitiyem protsessov kontsentratsii ekonomicheskoy aktivnosti v regione: podkhody novoy ekonomicheskoy geografii [Managing the development of processes of concentration of economic activity in the region: Approaches to new economic geography]. Moscow: Ekon-inform; 2013. 131 p. (In Russ.)
11. Sasaev NI. Analysis of the strategic approach to industrial development in Russia. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2023;3(3):348–362. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2023-3-3-348-362
12. Suvorova AV, Kotlyarova SN. Specific features of population and housing concentration in the regions of the Ural Federal District. Municipality: Economics and Management. 2023;4:33–41. (In Russ.) https:// doi.org/10.22394/2304-3385-2023-4-33-41
13. Khvorostyanaya AS. Strategic brand transformation in consumer goods industry and fashion. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2023;3(1):86–96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2023-3-1-86-96
14. Atkinson A. B. On the measurement of inequality // Journal of Economic Theory. 1970. Vol. 2. P. 244–263.
15. Copus A. K. From core-periphery to polycentric development: concepts of spatial and Aspatial peripherality // European planning studies. 2001. Vol. 9(4). P. 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/713666491
16. Eder J. Peripheralization and knowledge bases in Austria: towards a new regional typology // European planning studies. 2019. Vol. 27(1). P. 42–67.
17. Fujita M., Ogawa H. Multiple equilibria and structural transition of nonmonocentric urban configuration // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 1982. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 161–196.
18. Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography // Journal of Political Economy. 1991. Vol. 99. № 3. P. 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
19. Krugman P., Venables A. J. Integration, Specialization, and Adjustment // European Economic Review. 1996. Vol. 40. № 3-5. P. 959–967.
20. Strange W. C. Agglomeration research in the age of disaggregation // Canadian Journal of Economics. 2009. Vol. 42. № 1. P. 1–27.