Abstract

Innovations are a key success factor for any enterprise in a dynamically changing and competitive market. Gold mining is a strategically important industry where sustainability and competitiveness depend heavily on innovation. This article describes the factors of uncertainty and irrationality in the innovation strategizing of gold mining enterprises. This work is devoted to the study of the role and assessment of uncertainty and irrationality factors in the innovation strategy of gold mining enterprises. The methodological basis of the research was the general theory of strategy and the methodology of strategizing, developed under the guidance of Academician V.L. Kvint. The ability of economic agents to identify and implement innovations forms of basis of competitiveness. According to the methodology of strategizing, innovative priorities of enterprises play an important role in the system of corporate strategy. However, innovation activity is associated with significant uncertainty, which determines the need for a more detailed study of this factor and its assessment when developing strategies. The paper identifies two types of uncertainty: measurable and unmeasurable. It is noted that the assessment of measurable uncertainty is significantly difficult due to the length of the life cycle of projects in the gold mining industry, where costs associated with long-term periods are discounted. In addition, the influence of behavioral factors on the decisions made has been established. The following behavioral biases of a strategic nature are highlighted: loss aversion, pure altruism, present bias, and risk aversion. Based on the analysis, an example of an assessment of measurable uncertainty in gold mining and the impact of behavioral biases on strategic decisions in the industry is provided. The results obtained confirm the importance of factors of irrationality of economic agents and uncertainty in the development of a strategy. The main conclusion is related to the need to create incentives for companies to innovate (from the government and investors), allowing producers to transfer the costs of later periods of project implementation to earlier stages, which can be achieved by implementing the proposed innovative strategic priorities.

Keywords

strategy, uncertainty, irrationality, behavioral bias, innovation, gold mining industry

REFERENCES

1. Druker PF, Maciariello JA. Management. Moscow: Vilʹyams [Williams]; 2010. 704 p. (In Russ.)
2. Zhuravlev DM. Strategizing of digital transformation of complex socio-economic systems. Ed. VL Kvint. St. Petersburg: IPC SZIU RANEPA; 2024. 352 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/978-5-89781-862-4
3. Kaneman D. Dumay medlenno... reshay bistro [Think slowly... Decide quickly]. Moscow: Act; 2018. 656 p. (In Russ.)
4. Nekipelov AD. Stanovlenie i funktsionirovanie ehkonomicheskikh institutov: ot "robinzonady" do rynochnoy ehkonomiki, osnovannoy na individualʹnom proizvodstve [The formation and functioning of economic institutions: from the "robinsonade" to a market economy based on individual production]. Moscow: Ehkonomist; 2006. 328 p.
5. Nikishina EN, Ivanov VV, Markova OA. Behavioral biases in the decision making and the possibilities of overcoming them. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2024;(3):15–41. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.3.2547
6. Novikova IV. Strategic features of formation of human resources potential of industry in scientific and technological development of Russia. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2025;18(3):325–332. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2025-3-1516
7. Rastvortseva SN, Panina EV, Kocheshkov MA. Tax instruments to stimulate innovations in EU countries. World Economy and International Relations. 2023;67(3):20–32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-3-20-32
8. Sapir J. The Strategic imperative and the paradigm shift in economics. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2021;1(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2021-1-1-1-14
9. Solntsev AK. Economic aspects of tailings dewatering as an innovative strategic priority of gold mining industry. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2025;18(4):518–528. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2025-4-1559
10. Semikova VL. Teoriya organizatsii. Antologiya [Theory of organization. The Anthology]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt; 2005. 960 p. (In Russ.)
11. Uilʹyamson O. Ehkonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma. Firmy, rynki, "otnoshencheskaya" kontraktatsiya [Economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, "relational" contracting]. St. Petersburg: Lenizdat; CEV Press; 1996. 702 p. (In Russ.)
12. Khvorostyanaya AS, Kvint VL. Regional strategy development and implementation: Key stages and priorities. The North and The Market: Forming the Economic Order. 2025;28(3):25–34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37614/2220-802X.3.2025.89.002
13. Herrera-León S, Lucay FA, Cisternas LA, Kraslawski A. Applying a multi-objective optimization approach in designing water supply systems for mining industries. The case of Chile. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;210:994–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.081
14. Benartzi S, Thaler RH. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1995;110(1):73–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118511
15. Coase RH. Economics and contiguous disciplines. The Journal of Legal Studies. 1978;7(2):201–211.
16. Herrera-León S, Cruz C, Kraslawski A, Cisternas LA. Current situation and major challenges of desalination in Chile. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2019;171:93–104. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.24863
17. Cyert R, March JG. A behavioral theory of the firm. Hoboken: Wiley, 1992. 268 p.
18. Fehr E, Fischbacher U. The nature of human altruism. Nature. 2003;425:785–791. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02043
19. Furnham A, Boo HC. A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2011;40(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2010.10.008
20. Knight FH. Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston, NY: Houghton Mifflin; 1921. № 31.
21. Koller T, Lovallo D, Williams Z. Overcoming a bias against risk. The McKinsey quarterly. 2012. № 3.
22. Kvint VL. Strategy for the Global Market: Theory and practical applications. NY: Routledge; 2016. 548 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709314
23. Kvint VL. The global emerging market: Strategic management and economics. NY: Routledge; 2009. 488 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882917
24. Meier S, Sprenger C. Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2010;2(1):193–210. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.1.193
25. Mokyr J. Technological inertia in economic history. The Journal of Economic History. 1992;52(2):325–338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700010767
26. Montesano A. On the definition of risk aversion. Theory and Decision. 1990;29:53–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134104
27. Neher PA. Natural resource economics. Conservation and exploitation. NY: Cambridge University press; 1990. 432 p.
28. Nguyen Q. Linking loss aversion and present bias with overspending behavior of tourists: Insights from a lab-in-the-field experiment. Tourism Management. 2016;54:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.019
29. Organ DW, Bateman TS. Organizational behavior. Homewood, IL: Irwin; 1991. 685 p.
30. Rodrik D. Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Cambridge: KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP04-047; 2004. P. 1–42.
31. Rose-Ackerman S. Altruism, nonprofits, and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature. 1996;34(2):701–728. https://elibrary.ru/CGDXKP
32. Roxburgh C. Hidden flaws in strategy. The McKinsey quarterly. NY: McKinsey & Company; 2003. № 2. 159 p.
33. Thaler RH, Benartzi S. Save more tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy. 2004;112(S1):S164–S187. https://doi.org/10.1086/380085
34. Turban E, Meredith JR. Fundamentals of management science Homewood, IL: Irwin; 1991. 1010 p.
35. Valdés-Pineda R, Pizarro R, García-Chevesich P, Valdés JB, Olivares C, Vera M, et al. Water governance in Chile: Availability, management and climate change. Journal of Hydrology. 2014;519(Part C):2538–2567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.016