«Department of scientific and publishing activities»
Ru En Cn
Open access
Subscription/purchasing
Submit manuscript
Home >Strategizing: Theory and Practice > Archive > Volume 4, Issue 4, 2024 > Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering
ISSN 2782-2435 (Print),
ISSN 2782-2621 (Online)

Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering

Valeria V. Krayushkina a
,
Maria S. Varenik b
Affiliation
a Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
b Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Copyright ©Krayushkina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Received 14 October, 2024 | Accepted in revised form 29 October, 2024 | Published 11 November, 2024
DOI: http://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-481-498
Abstract
The article describes the strategizing prospects for Russia’s technological sovereignty in the sphere of mechanical engineering. The authors used the methodology of strategizing developed by Professor V. L. Kvint to identify the problem field of industrial development and design an OTSW matrix of strategic analysis. The approach made it possible to define the key priorities in the strategic management system to ensure Russia’s technological independence in mechanical engineering. First, production and academia should unite to solve the problem of qualifications and competencies. Second, digital technologies are to form a consolidating system of digital management of technology development and implementation. The system will provide knowledge management, platform solutions, and expert-machine decision support. Eventually, it will diversify the tools of technological development and implementation, thus leading to public-private partnerships, strategic cooperation, and foreign investments that will fund further R&D projects. These priorities are comprehensive elements in the strategy for ensuring the technological independence of mechanical engineering in Russia. They are bound for success on the way to help the domestic mechanical engineering to cope with the current economic challenges.
Keywords
strategizing, technological sovereignty, mechanical engineering, theory of strategizing by V. L. Kvint
REFERENCES
  1. Alabina TA. The Role of the Concept of Strategizing by V.L. Kvint in Economic Research of Strategies and its Features. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(9):45–57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-9-45-57
  2. Vinokurov EY, Grichik MV. New concept of international reserve assets: Security, diversification and nonconventional approaches. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2022;(12):24–43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-12-24-43
  3. Grinev SA, Kvint VL. Formation of strategic priorities of industrial development of the Russian Federation as an innovative factor in overcoming crisis periods. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2023;16(3):275–283. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-3-275-283
  4. Kvint VL. Methodological Aspects of Developing Medial Strategies. Problems and Prospects for Industrial Development in Russia: Proceedings of VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference in Industrial Economics under Sanctions. Moscow: KnoRus; 2021. P. 190–192. https://www.elibrary.ru/REAMZU
  5. Kvint VL, Babkin AV, Shkarupeta EV. Strategizing of forming a platform operating model to increase the level of digital maturity of industrial systems. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2022;15(3):249–261. https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2022-3-249-261
  6. Kvint VL, Bodrunov SD. Strategic transformation of society: knowledge, technology, and noonomy. St. Petersburg: INIR after S. Yu. Vitte; 2021. 351 p. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/FKSHWL
  7. Kvint VL, Novikova IV, Alimuradov MK. Alignment of Global and National Interest with Regional Strategic Priorities. Economics and Management. 2021;27(11):900–909. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-11-900-909
  8. Kvint VL, Novikova IV, Alimuradov MK, Sasaev NI. Strategizing the National Economy during a Period of Burgeoning Technological Sovereignty. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(9):57–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-57-67
  9. Kvint VL, Fetisov VA, Alimuradov MK. The Fundamentals of Russia's Environmental Development Strategy. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University Publishing House; 2021. 77 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29003/m2447.978-5-19-011631-1
  10. Kvint VL. The Concept of Strategizing. Vol 1. St. Petersburg: NWIM RANEPA, 2019. 132 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Korovkin VV, Kuznetsova GV. Prospects for Digital Transformation in Russian Machine Building Industry. Ars Administrandi (The Art of Management). 2020;12(2):291–313. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2020-2-291-313
  12. Okrepilov VV. The Role of The Economy of Quality in The Period of Innovative Transformation of Socio-Economic Development. Economic Revival of Russia. 2023;(2):33–41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2023-2(76)-33-41
  13. Okrepilov VV. Economics of Quality: The Most Important Direction in The Development of Economic Science. Problemy Prognozirovaniya. 2022;5:78–90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-194-78-90
  14. Saipova LHA, Ozdamirova LM, Jamaldinova MA. Research on the Application of Information Technology in Mechanical Engineering. Industrial Economics. 2023;(3):91–94 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886_2023_3_91
  15. Sasaev NI. Fundamental basis for the formation of a new strategizing culture. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2021;14(2):153–163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2021-2-153-163
  16. Shatskaya IV. Competitive advantages as an element of the strategy of an educational organization (based on the V.L. Kvint’s methodology). Journal of Modern Competition. 2021;15(4):127–139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0649- 2021-15-4-127-139
  17. Bhalla S, Alfnes E, Hvolby H-H. Tools and practices for tactical delivery date setting in engineer-to-order environments: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research. 2023;61(7):2339–2371 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2057256
  18. Bhalla S, Alfnes E, Hvolby H-H. Oluyisola O. Sales and operations planning for delivery date setting in engineer-to-order manufacturing: a research synthesis and framework. International Journal of Production Research. 2023;61(21):7302–7332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2148010
  19. Cannas VG, Gosling J. A decade of engineering-to-order (2010–2020): Progress and emerging themes. International journal of production economics. 2021;241:108274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108274
  20. Fang J, Wei X. A knowledge support approach for the preliminary design of platform-based products in Engineering-To-Order manufacturing. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2020;46:101196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101196
  21. Kvint VL. Strategy for the Global Market: Theory and Practical Applications. New York: Routledge, 2015. 548 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709314
  22. Neumann A, Hajji A, Rekik M, Pellerin R. A model for advanced planning systems dedicated to the Engineer-To-Order context. International Journal of Production Economics. 2022;252:108557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108557
  23. Neumann A, Hajji A, Rekik M, Pellerin R. Genetic algorithms for planning and scheduling engineer-to-order production: a systematic review. International Journal of Production Research. 2024;62:2888–2917. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2237122
  24. Neumann A, Hajji A, Rekik M, Pellerin R. Integrated planning and scheduling of engineer-to-order projects using a Lamarckian Layered Genetic Algorithm. International Journal of Production Economics. 2024;267:109077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109077
  25. Olson DL, Wu D, Shanlin Y, Lambert JH. Complex product manufacturing in the intelligence-connected era. International Journal of Production Research. 2019;57(21):6702–6704. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1645442
  26. Poeschl S, Wirth F, Bauernhansl T. Strategic process planning for commissioning processes in mechanical engineering. International Journal of Production Research. 2019;57(21):6727–6739. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1556408
  27. Stefano G, Denicol J, Broyd T, Davies A. What are the strategies to manage megaproject supply chains? A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Project Management. 2023;41(3):102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102457
  28. Vodomerov NK. The systematic development of mechanical engineering is a key link in increasing the competitiveness of the Russian economy. Journal of Regional and International Competitiveness. 2023;4(1):35–48. https://www.elibrary.ru/FYUDDB
How to quote?
Krayushkina VV, Varenik MS. Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2024;4(4):481–498. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-481-498

About journal

Download
Contents
Abstract
Keywords
References
Strategizing: theory and practice uses cookies. By continuing to use the portal, you agree to the storage and use of cookies by the portal and partner sites on your device.
Manage files