Abstract

Regions to participate in integrated development programs can be strategically prioritized. In this study, a review of global best practices made it possible to design a model of territorial development with its basic and strategic quantitative parameters. The model parameters included average annual working population, average gross regional product per citizen, total residential area per citizen, volume of construction activity, number of residential buildings commissioned, number of broadband Internet users per 100 population, working urban and rural residents, etc. The author applied these rating indicators to eight federal districts in order to identify first priority areas for integrated development. The article also contains some general conclusions on the territorial development in the Russian Federation.

Keywords

strategizing, strategy, regions, integrated development of territories, modeling

REFERENCES

1. Bondarenko NV, Morozova NV, Vasilyeva IA. Strategic Priorities of Social Development of Territories. Innovative Development of the Economy. 2020;(6):113–120. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/GRUXUD
2. Vasilenko DV. Foresight in selecting strategic priorities for territorial development. Proceedings of Economics. 2020;(18):32–41. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/QLSUPG
3. Generalova SV. Digitalization As a Strategic Priority of Territorial Development. Humanitarian Scientific Journal. 2020;(1):19–23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2078-9661-2020-10003
4. Ginzburg OR. Integrated development as a priority for urban development. Current issues in science and practice: Proceedings of the XII international scientific and practical conference. Samara: Dendra Limited Liability Company. 2018. p. 61–66. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/VUKYGS
5. Golova IM. Substantiation the strategic priorities of innovation regional development security. Economy Of Regions. 2014;(3):218–232. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17059/2014-3-22
6. Dianova VA. Concept of integrated urban development as an imperative of strategic management. Innovations in Science. 2012;(8–2):35–38. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/RENYKB
7. Zalivukhin IV. Integrated approach as a priority for urban development. Sociodigger. 2022;3(9):39–40. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ASOGGQ
8. Kvint VL. The Concept of Strategizing. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University; 2022. 170 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/978-5-8353-2562-7
9. Kvint VL. The Global Emerging Market: Strategic Management and Economics. Moscow: Biznes Atlas, 2012. 627 p. (In Russ.)
10. Kvint VL, Khvorostyanaya AS, Sasaev NI. Advanced Technologies in Strategizing. Economics and Management. 2020;26(11):1170–1179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-11-1170-1179
11. Lysov PV. Managing socio-economic environment: foreign experience. Tambov University Review: Series Humanities. 2014;(4):123–130. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/VMFASN
12. Lyubovnyy VYa. Urban Agglomerations of Russia: From Natural to Targeted Development. Municipality: Economics and Management. 2015;(1):5–16. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/TOABVJ
13. Mambetova FA, Marshanov BM. Assessing the socio-economic potential of the region to identify strategic priorities for territorial development. News of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of Ras. 2010;(4):33–42. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/MTWGZF
14. Miroshnikov SN. Spatial Development as the Basis of System Approach of State Territorial Management. Society and Power. 2018;(4):61–67. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/YMRIHZ
15. Morozova LV, Enin AE. Development of Small and Medium Towns Under the Influence of an Agglomeration. Russian Journal of Building Construction and Architecture. 2024;(1):98–108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36622/2541-7592.2024.73.1.009
16. Pechatkin VV. Formation and Development of the Digital Economy in Russia as a Strategic Priority for the Development of Territories in the Context of Pandemics. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2020;10(2):837–848. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.10.2.110187
17. Popkova AA, Konev YuM, Kanyukov MV. Integrated Development of Territories: Current State and Problems of Implementation. News of higher education institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics. 2023;16(2):38–53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/1993-1824-2023-2-38-53
18. Polujanova NV, Kireeva NA, Kublin IM, Prushchak OV. Regional Socio-Economic Policies and Sustainable Development: Priorities for Rural Territories Development. Economics of Sustainable Development. 2021;(4):144–152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37124/20799136_2021_4_48_144
19. Sinitskaya NYa, Nikolaev AV. Indicators of strategic management of regional development // Financial, economic, and information support for innovative regional development: Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Yalta: Arial Publishing House, Limited Liability Company. 2018. p. 88–91. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/YSJWPQ
20. Kvint VL, Novikova IV, Alimuradov MK, Sasaev NI. Strategizing the National Economy during a Period of Burgeoning Technological Sovereignty. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(9):57–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-57-67
21. Chaika DE. Digitalization as a Strategic Priority for the Development of Territories in a Pandemic. Spatial development of territories: Proceedings of the IV International scientific and practical conference. Belgorod: Epicenter Limited Liability Company. 2021. p. 98–102. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/BPZEGZ
22. Chuprikova NV. Priority Directions of Development of Economy Regions of The Russian Federation in The Context of Attracting Investments. Social-Economic Phenomena and Processes. 2016;11(11):105–111. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/XRNSVH
23. Shmakova V, Kuznetsova YuA. Accounting of the Stages of the Life Cycle of the Territory When Choosing Strategic Priorities of Territorial Development (Social Aspect). Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. 2018;7(4):351–354. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/YSZHYD