Abstract

Crucial industries of the Russian Federation require new organizational and economic development forms. The present article introduces an innovative form of interaction between economic entities: it is crossindustrial and metaverse-based. The article also features a detailed analysis of the strategic potential of industrial metaverses that can boost the development of important domestic industries in the conditions of economic mobilization. The authors focused on the factors that predetermine the need to create such industrial metaverses.

Keywords

metaverse, ecosystem, mobilization economy, strategy, industry

REFERENCES

1. Bakhtizin AR, Il'in NI, Kachan MV. Development of the strategic management system in the context of digitalization. Economic Strategies. 2022;24(1):20–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33917/es-1.181.2022.20-33
2. Bodrunov SD. Technological progress: Prerequisite and result of the socio-humanitarian direction of economic development. Economic Revival of Russia. 2022;71(1):5–13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-1-71-5-13
3. Bystrov AV, Tolstykh TO, Radaykin AG. Cross-industry ecosystem as an organizational and economic model for the development of high-tech industries. Economics and Management. 2020;26(6):564–576. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-6-564-576
4. Gamidullaeva LA, Tolstykh TO, Shmeleva NV. Promyshlennye i territorialʹnye ehkosistemy v kontekste ustoychivogo razvitiya [Industrial and territorial ecosystems in the context of sustainable development]. Penza: Izdatelʹstvo Penza State University; 2022. 157 p. (In Russ.)
5. Babkin AV, Koryagin SI, Lieberman IV, Klachek PM. Industry 5.0: Creation of cyber-social ecosystems in the economy and industry (by the example of the transport sector). In: Babkin AV, editor. Tsifrovaya ehkonomika i Industriya 5.0: razvitie v novoy realʹnosti [Digital Economy and Industry 5.0: Development in the New Reality]. St. Petersburg: POLITEKH-PRESS; 2022. pp. 182–204. (In Russ.)
6. Kvint VL. Kontseptsiya strategirovaniya. T. 1 [The concept of strategizing. Vol. 1.]. St. Petersburg: SZIU RANKhiGS; 2019. 132 p. (In Russ.)
7. Kvint VL. The concept of strategizing. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg: SZIU RANKhiGS; 2020. 162 p. (In Russ.)
8. Kleiner GB. Industrial ecosystems: Foresight. Economic Revival of Russia. 2018;56(2):53–62. (In Russ.)
9. Novikova IV, Xie K. Comparative analysis of strategies of Chinese companies in the digital economy. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2022;15(2):226–233. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2022-2-226-233
10. Radaykin AG. Mekhanizm kross-otraslevogo vzaimodeystviya vysokotekhnologichnykh otrasley promyshlennosti [The mechanism of high-tech cross-industry interaction]: Cand. sci. eco. diss. Moscow: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics; 2021. 168 p. (In Russ.)
11. Sachkov EA. Reconfiguration of Russia’s economic security system. Horizons of Economics. 2022;67(1):41–45. (In Russ.)
12. Shatskaya IV. The concept of strategic personnel management for innovative development of Russia. St. Petersburg: SZIU RANKhiGS; 2021. 340 p. (In Russ.)
13. Adner R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review. 2006;84(4):98–107.
14. Tolstykh TO, Shmeleva NV, Alpeeva EA, Boboshko DYu, Malkova TB. Ecosystem approach for assessing the socio-economic development of industrial and regional systems in the context of digitalization. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. 2022;245:1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77000-6_186
15. Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A. Industries, ecosystems, platforms, and architectures: Rethinking our strategy constructs at the aggregate level. London Business School; 2015.
16. Moore JF. The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: HarperBusiness; 1996. 328 p.
17. Tansley AG. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology. 1935;16(3):284–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070