Abstract

This article introduces a new analysis algorithm that can be applied to territorial organization of urban systems. After directed zoning, the zones are divided into those of balance and those of disproportions. The obtained solutions of the territorial-communication model are compared with a fractal standard, which serves as an indicator of the most effective urban organization in terms of the basic life support infrastructures and their communications. The algorithm makes it possible to reveal territorial disproportions of the urban environment, i.e., risk areas that violate the stability of the urban system as a whole and require external management.

Keywords

self-organization, non-equilibrium systems, management, urban systems, development strategy, system stability, multifractal dynamics

REFERENCES

1. Babich VN, Kolyasnikov VA. Fractal structures in the lay-out and building of city. Akademicheskiy Vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN. 2009;(2):43–45. (In Russ.)
2. Baevskiy OA. Territorialʹnoe planirovanie i proektirovanie na osnove issledovaniya prostranstvennoy struktury goroda: kurs lektsiy [Territorial planning and design based on the study of the spatial structure of the city: a course of lectures]. Vysokovsky Graduate School of Urbanism; 2016. (In Russ.)
3. Balkhanov VK. Osnovy fraktalʹnoy geometrii i fraktalʹnogo ischisleniya [Fundamentals of fractal geometry and fractal calculus]. Ulan-Ude: Buryat State University; 2013. 224 p. (In Russ.)
4. Vorobʹev YuL, Malinetskiy GG, Makhutov NA. Upravlenie riskom i ustoychivoe razvitie. Chelovecheskoe izmerenie [Risk management and sustainable development. Human dimension]. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2000;(6):150–162. (In Russ.)
5. Gostev MV. On the heuristic nature of evolutionary urban development models. Urban Studies and Practices. 2018;3(1):7–22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/usp3120187-22
6. Gutnov AE. Systems approach to urban development: foundations and outline of a theory. In: Gvishiani DM, editor. Systems research. Methodological problems. Moscow: Nauka; 1986. pp. 211–232. (In Russ.)
7. Gushchina ES, Smogunov VV. Fractal dimension in estimation of a large city planning structure. Modern Scientific Researches and Innovations. 2016;58(2):110–116. (In Russ.).
8. Iudin DI, Koposov EV. Fraktaly: ot prostogo k slozhnomu [Fractals: from simple to complex]. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering; 2012. 183 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kvint VL, Novikova IV, Alimuradov MK. Alignment of global and national interest with regional strategic priorities. Economics and Management. 2021;27(11):900–909. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-11-900-909
10. Malkov SYu. Sotsialʹnaya samoorganizatsiya i istoricheskiy protsess: vozmozhnosti matematicheskogo modelirovaniya [Social self-organization and historical process: possibilities of mathematical modeling]. Moscow: Knizhnyy dom “LIBROKOM”; 2009. 240 p. (In Russ.)
11. Nasonov AN. Geoecological assessment of soil productivity disturbance in urban landscapes based on fractal biotesting methods. Dagestan State Pedagogical University Journal. Natural and Exact Sciences. 2021;15(2):75–83. (In Russ.)
12. Nikonorov SM. The transition from a strategy of social and economic development to the sustainable development strategy. Management and Business Administration. 2016;(4):28–35. (In Russ.)
13. Nikonorov SM, Papenov KV, Talavrinov VA. Business transition to ESG-Strategies: Innovative approaches in Russian and international experience. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2022;2(1):49–56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2022-2-1-49-56
14. Pavlov YuV. Fractals as a tool for regional planning of agglomeration’s systems. Fundamental Research. 2013;(10–10):2242–2248. (In Russ.)
15. Podlazov AV. Teoriya samoorganizovannoy kritichnosti – nauka o slozhnosti [Theory of self-organized criticality: the science of complexity]. In: Malinetskiy GG, editor. Budushchee prikladnoy matematiki. Lektsii dlya molodykh issledovateley [The future of applied mathematics. Lectures for young researchers]. Moscow: Ehditorial URSS; 2005. pp. 404–426. (In Russ.)
16. Koposov EV, Vinogradova TP, Iudin DI, Kaschenko OV, Chechin AV, Mareeva EE. Structural evolution of city environment morphology in a historical aspect on the example of Nizhny Novgorod. Privolzhsky Scientific Journal. 2012;24(4):138–144.
17. Kul`nev VV, Nasonov AN, Tsvetkov IV, Mezhova LA, Larionov AN. Fractal approach to manageability evaluation of ecological risks. Dagestan State Pedagogical University Journal. Natural and Exact Sciences. 2019;13(4):101–111. (In Russ.)
18. Batty M. Building a science of cities. Cities. 2012;29:S9–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.008
19. Marques ML, Ferreira MC. Occupation density analysis for urban agglomeration growth of São Paulo metropolitan through fractal dimensions estimate. Geografia. 2006;31(2):293–316.