Abstract

Introduction. The strategy for the transition to a new level of technological development of the economy is aimed at accelerating innovations and increasing competitiveness. New opportunities for technological development form a favorable environment that promotes economic growth by introducing energy-efficient and resource-saving industrial technologies, technical re-equipment, and production modernization. Study objects and methods. The present research featured the technological development of the economy. The study relied on the theory and methodology of the strategizing developed by Professor V.L. Kvint. The methods included generalization, synthesis, criteria analysis, and causal method. Results and discussion. The article describes the chronological sequence of evolutionary development of technologies while focusing on how scientific and technical progress boosted the dynamics of production changes. Effective strategic planning tools guarantee prompt management decisions aimed at solving various strategic production and non-productive tasks. Technological road maps are an especially useful tool: they describe both the main result of innovation and the process of long-term planning, combined with the specifics of the choice, transfer, introduction, and industrial development of technologies. Conclusion. The analysis performed made it possible to identify and substantiate the strategic capabilities and priorities of the technological development of Russian economy. The obtained results can help to determine the strategic tasks of bringing domestic economy to a new level of technological development.

Keywords

strategic management, strategy, technological changes, technological roadmaps, technology transfer, innovations, economic development

REFERENCES

1. Kvint VL. Kontseptsiya strategirovaniya. T. 1 [The concept of strategizing. Vol. 1.]. St. Petersburg: SZIU RANKhiGS; 2019. 132 p. (In Russ.)
2. Kvint VL. The concept of strategizing. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg: SZIU RANKhiGS; 2020. 162 p. (In Russ.)
3. Kvint VL. Global emerging market: Strategic management and economics. Moscow: Biznes Atlas; 2012. 626 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kvint VL. The factors involved in determining the priorities of innovative strategies. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya promyshlennosti Rossii: sbornik Materialov pyatoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Forsayt promyshlennogo razvitiya: vybor prioritetov i rasstanovka aktsentov” [Problems and Prospects for the Development of Russian Industry: Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Industrial Development Foresight: Choosing Priorities and Emphasizing”]; 2019; Moscow. Moscow: Ruscience; 2019. p. 21–23. (In Russ.)
5. Clayton A. Technology roadmaps: Tools for development. Foresight and STI Governance. 2008;2(3):68–74. (In Russ.)
6. Kudina MV. Innovatsionnaya ehkonomika [Innovative economy]. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 2018. 272 p. (In Russ.)
7. Lapidus LV. Digital economy: e-business and e-commerce management. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2018. 381 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/monography_5ad4a677581404.52643793
8. Kvint VL, Vlasyuk LI, Evdokimov DS, Azarov YuYu, Alabina TA, Aleshkovsky IA, et al. Strategizing of the digital Kuzbass region. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University; 2021. 434 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/978-5-8353-2796-6
9. Khvorostyanaya AS. Technology transfer association industrial strategy development program (on the example of the fashion industry and apparel and textile industry). Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2019;12(2):147–158. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2019-2-147-158
10. Khvorostyanaya AS. Strategic role of the technology transfer centers in the development of creative industries of the economy. Creative Economy. 2020;14(7):1221–1238. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.14.7.110546
11. Khvorostyanaya AS. Strategic prospects for the national technology transfer development. Genezis noonomiki: NTP, diffuziya sobstvennosti, sotsializatsiya obshchestva, solidarizm: sbornik plenarnykh dokladov Obʺedinennogo mezhdunarodnogo kongressa SPEHK-PNO-2020 [Genesis of noonomics: scientific and technical progress, diffusion of property, socialization of society, and solidarism: collection of plenary reports of the Joint International Congress SPEC-PNO-2020]; 2020; Moscow. St. Petersburg: S.Yu. Vitte Institute of New Industrial Development; 2021. p. 121–131. (In Russ.)
12. Choi C, Park Y. Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2009;76(6):754–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.007
13. Ding C, Liu C, Zheng C, Li F. Digital economy, technological innovation and high-quality economic development: Based on spatial effect and mediation effect. Sustainability. 2022;14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010216
14. Howells JRL Regional development and technology. In: Kobayashi A, editor. International encyclopedia of human geography. Second edition. Elsevier; 2020.
15. Kvint VL. Strategy for the global market: Theory and practical applications. New York: Routledge; 2015. 548 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709314
16. McDowall W. Technology roadmaps for transition management: The case of hydrogen energy. 2012;79(3):530–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.10.002
17. Pattit JM, Raj SP, Wilemon D. An institutional theory investigation of U.S. technology development trends since the mid-19th century. Research Policy. 2012;41(2):306–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.008
18. Pietrobelli C, Puppato F. Technology foresight and industrial strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2015;110:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.021
19. Romanyuk M, Sukharnikova M, Chekmareva N. Trends of the digital economy development in Russia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;650(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/650/1/012017
20. Wei L. Research on quality evaluation and promotion strategy of digital economy development. Open Journal of Business and Management. 2020;(2):932–942. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2020.82058